Contents
- Home
- News
- Mr Brown praises good Samaritans
- Emissions, not clothes, must tumble, says coalition
- First-class Lichfield licks its rivals
- China’s relief efforts praised
- Tax evasion costs the lives of the poor, says Christian Aid
- Two months to go and bishops are still checking in
- News in brief
- Williams’s embryo unease
- Another east London priest suffers assault in churchyard
- Cricket hots up
- In the pink
- ‘Abandon safeguards’ on women bishops
- Numb
- Muslim takeover an exaggeration, says statistician
- There are no losers in Irish peace, says Primate
- All together
- MPs probe unhappiness of value deficit
- Roosting
- Cardinal: be tentative in faith
- ‘Dump the churchy chat ups'
- Well-backed
- Foreign news in brief
- Chad accused by Sudan after attack
- Accentuate the positive, says Dr Neill
- Ceremony
- To the point
- Bakare denounces police for disrupting churches
- Kasper queries Anglican status
- Junta hampers aid-agency efforts in Burma
- Question of the week
- Comment
- Letters
- Real Life
- Features
- Faith
- Humour and crossword
- Pastimes
- Books
- Arts
- Media
- Gazette
back to News |
previous story
|
next story
|
‘Abandon safeguards’ on women bishops
by a staff reporter
NEARLY HALF the women who are currently ordained in the Church of England have urged that no legal safeguards are given to people opposed to women bishops. A statement reacting to the options in the Manchester report on women bishops (News, 2 May), was sent to each of the bishops on Monday, signed by more than 500 women clerics. Since then, a further 213 have added their names. The statement says: “We believe that it should be possible for women to be consecrated as bishop, but not at any price. The price of legal ‘safeguards’ for those opposed is simply too high, diminishing not just the women concerned, but the catholicity, integrity and mission of the episcopate and of the Church. . . We cannot countenance any proposal that would, once again, enshrine and formalise discrimination against women in legislation.” The signatories deny that opting for the simplest measure shows a lack of care for those who remain opposed to women’s ordained ministry. They argue that a code of practice should be enough of a safeguard. Letters |
back to News |
back to top |
previous story
|
next story
|

.gif)

